top of page

Rupert Lowe likes masked protests on the RIGHT not Left

Sep 6
2 min read

Rupert Lowe’s long-running case against anonymous face coverings collided this weekend with the Dover “stop the boats” blockade, after an older post of his resurfaced in the argument over the protest.


The screenshot being circulated is Lowe’s earlier statement that successful societies rest on recognition: people looking each other in the eye and speaking face-to-face rather than appearing as “anonymous figures hidden behind intimidating black face coverings.” He used that principle to call for a full ban on the burqa, niqab and other full-face coverings in public spaces, with narrow exceptions for medical or occupational needs. He has repeated the position for months, describing the garments as oppressive, unsafe, un-British and a political symbol that should not become normal on British streets


On Saturday 5 September hundreds of people dressed in black and wearing balaclavas blocked roads into the Port of Dover, chanting “stop the boats.” Traffic into and out of the port was halted for several hours. Kent Police called it a spontaneous protest, made no arrests, and said the group had dispersed by midday. Local politicians and ministers described the scene as intimidating; Nigel Farage said people should not be allowed to protest “masked up, balaclava-ed up.”


Lowe’s response the same afternoon treated the event as an expression of public anger rather than focusing on the masks. He said people were “annoyed, furious actually,” that he understood the frustration, and that “from what I understand, today’s protest was exactly that” — peaceful. He added that nobody wants disruption and urged protesters to keep it to a minimum, while insisting the government must start listening and acting on small-boat crossings, deportations and overall immigration numbers. Restore Britain, he said, is the vehicle for that. On Sunday morning he posted a video stating that Restore Britain “proudly stands with those peacefully protesting against illegal immigration in Dover.”


The two positions sit side by side. Lowe has consistently opposed the principle of public anonymity behind “intimidating black face coverings.” At the same time he has framed Saturday’s action as ordinary Britons making a legitimate, if disruptive, point that politicians have ignored. The circulating screenshot therefore functions less as a new policy announcement and more as a reminder of the consistency he claims on visibility and social trust, even as he draws a line between that principle and support for the underlying immigration protest.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​


Lowe doesn’t mind masked protests on the right but hates them on the left this proves he’s not serious about banning faces coverings


bottom of page